tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post8185882792139076983..comments2018-12-26T07:39:56.423-07:00Comments on REASON POWER POLICY: Does Natural Selection Account for All Biophenomena?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05431036725490947171noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-46520007897991491922016-06-13T19:07:55.674-06:002016-06-13T19:07:55.674-06:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.chenlilihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04122629242002825519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-16737294858540173492013-02-25T14:46:47.233-07:002013-02-25T14:46:47.233-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-64610200643098655372013-02-12T04:21:43.133-07:002013-02-12T04:21:43.133-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-86885157416246440732013-01-29T05:08:44.534-07:002013-01-29T05:08:44.534-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-55652170163542202722013-01-25T17:30:34.966-07:002013-01-25T17:30:34.966-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-8541218492134668372013-01-23T22:22:08.122-07:002013-01-23T22:22:08.122-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-53160060989042517842012-12-30T17:05:00.041-07:002012-12-30T17:05:00.041-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-77562852011769005432012-12-20T06:48:46.591-07:002012-12-20T06:48:46.591-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-57230297430080988462012-12-20T04:45:52.227-07:002012-12-20T04:45:52.227-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-54387557101182887612012-12-20T02:42:44.489-07:002012-12-20T02:42:44.489-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-84737581742700752342009-10-29T22:30:29.230-06:002009-10-29T22:30:29.230-06:00I think you've hit on something that most scie...I think you've hit on something that most scientists overlook entirely, but how can you account for missing evidence? I agree that it's bad science to use assumptions to replace evidence -- even in cases where the equation makes perfect rational sense, that does not mean it is correct. <br /><br />Not everything was selected for, and Darwin is even clear on this point, that nature does not care at all about many things that people are fixated upon, such as appearance. A great deal of characteristics have nothing whatever to do with survival and aren't relevant to evolution. <br /><br />It makes sense that one can't use natural selection as a blanket explanation, though I wonder how science can possibly live up to such a high standard of proof. There is a fine distinction between theory and presumption.jennhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07771744219758353994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8011567817570086256.post-57763079716835635172009-10-29T20:49:49.462-06:002009-10-29T20:49:49.462-06:00Excellent post, and it is worth pointing out that ...Excellent post, and it is worth pointing out that a lot of evolved traits can be thought of as mistakes. For example, men are susceptible to prostate cancer precisely because the urethra goes through the prostate whereas it would have been evolutionarily beneficial for the urethra to go around the prostate. That is just one example.Justin Wehrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15171211679701874613noreply@blogger.com